Non-self-referential Labeling
In labeling one is trying to use an objective description of what is happing rather than a self-referential perspective. Describe what is noted without the use of the word I. In describing a sensation from the I perspective will only support reification of self and subsequent identification with it.
Label what is present by “NAMING IT”
This initial approach to labeling is to name the content, what is known. This can include several options. One could label the type of sensing, the sensation that is known in a general sense, the sensation that is known in a more specific sense, the interpretation of what is known and the reactive self-referential thoughts and emotions. Conventionally one might say: “I am hearing. I am hearing a sound. I am hearing the sound of a bird. I am hearing a pleasant sound of a bird. I am enjoying the sound.”
Preferably one would label in the following manner without the ownership of the sense of self: “Hearing. Hearing a sound. Hearing the sound of a bird. Hearing a pleasant sound of a bird. Enjoying the sound.”
Label what is present as “IS KNOWN”
Another approach to labeling content is saying what is present “is known.” One is not saying what it is known by. This open-ended statement forces one to consider the options. Is it me who knows? Or is it knowing that knows? Adding “is known” to the label points to the other aspect of the knowing of what is known, not just what is known. For example, one would say: “Judging is known. Sadness is known. Throbbing is known.”
Label what is present as “KNOWING”
This may be the most effective way of labelling as it more directly anchors one into the active process of the awarenessing of what is known. The emphasis is on the knowing rather than what is known. One can state: “Knowing (sadness, anger etc.)”
by Dr. Phil Blustein
February 6, 2026




